You could actually say that they 7B is pretty similar to the SM58, but it just as a lot of extra bells and whistles that make it make quiet. The Procaster and the SM7B are pretty similar in quality. Here's a good video about if you should upgrade your gear. You'll notice a difference, but nobody is going to care. If you had a Neweer, yes, you should upgrade and you'll see a big difference, between these two though. As far as the audience perspective, mic sound quality has high diminishing returns. If you are looking for an increase in sound quality that your listeners will notice, no. Traveling: Depends on the duration-if it is a day or two, I have an ATR2100 (USB/XLR) that I will run into my laptop (I also use this config for man on the street stuff with the Zoom), or if I am gone for longer I will bring my Rode Podcaster and set that up in a semi permanent studio in my hotel. And either the Rodecaster on a battery pack or a Zoom H4NPro In the field: Behringer 8700S mics (Shure 58 knockoffs) that ran me $40 for 3. Longer podast with guests in studio: move the Rodecaster and run 4 Procasters The SM7B will provide it too, but most of them will not discern it.įWIW, I have several setups for what I need.ĭaily Podcast: Rodecaste Pro and Procaster Mic Most of my listeners are listening through.Ĭheap Earpods (some may have higher end Apple ones but)Īnd even if they are listening on quality devices, chances are they are expectign quality audio and what you have provides it. I do not look for the same quality that I do when I listen to a CD or stream digital audio. People are looking for quality audio, but not digital quality for the most part. On my studio monitors or burned to a CD, etc. I could spend $5000 on a mic and my vocals would be fantastic. You will be fine with the SM7B as far as gain.Īnother question I ask myself. Resources /r/podcasting Wiki Related Subreddits Questions? Posted something that's missing? Ask a mod. Promotional posts for products and services are prohitted unless pre-approved by the moderators.These are okay in comments, when relevant. Links to deals are okay but do not post affiliate links or your for-profit content as new links.While I understand a pat on the back and a word of encouragement is a good thing, it's extraneous to the purpose of the subreddit. Please no kudos threads where you reach a milestone, thank the academy and your agent or another gratuitous congratulatory verbiage as these look suspiciously like a self-promotional post in an attempt to bypass Rule 3.However, if you're looking for feedback, use the Weekly Episode Threads. Starting a discussion about your podcast is okay when it presents a topic for others to join in.Do not post links to your podcast as new links.Please write descriptive titles and posts when starting new threads.We discuss anything related to podcasting, provide promotion and feedback in our Weekly Episode Threads, and offer advice for podcasters of all skill levels. The M70 PRO X delivered thick, detailed low-end information with plenty of accuracy and without a trace of muddiness, supporting a smooth, natural-sounding midrange that lacked the hollow shoebox-esque sound that plagues cheaper dynamic microphones./r/podcasting is a subreddit for people who make podcasts. "Overall, I found that the M70 PRO X held its own against the SM7B in nearly every frequency range. The recordings come out clear and without distortion." This mic reproduces the human voice very accurately, whether speaking or singing, though it is advertised specifically as having a speech-optimized frequency response. "The Beyerdynamic M70 PRO X is an all-around simple mic with excellent sound quality, meriting its big price tag. MusicRadar verdict: Aimed primarily at broadcasting and speech uses, the M 70 Pro X delivers an excellent combination of sonics and visuals, making it a great choice for videocasting. Overall this is a well conceived and competitively priced mic ideal for broadcast voice and beyond. It’s not quite as smooth as my normal large capsule condenser, but we're in favour of the upfront nature. We’ve used the M 70 Pro X on a number of voiceovers and have to say like the results. This isn’t a deal breaker, but you’ll get the best results staying bang on the end of the headstock.Īlthough it’s designed for speech we did give the mic a go on some other sources and it was a bit too edgy for high frequency sources such tambourine or shaker, but worked well with acoustic guitar. The polar pattern is pretty smooth in the mid range, but if you drift off axis the higher frequencies do suffer a bit. Looking at the frequency graph this seems focused on 4kHz and 8kHz but there’s a general lift from about 1kHz upwards. Sonically, the M 70 Pro X is tailored for speech, and the overall curve is boosted in the high mids to help add clarity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |